<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Sarah Palin RNC VP Acceptance Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/04/video-sarah-palin-rnc-vp-acceptance-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/04/video-sarah-palin-rnc-vp-acceptance-speech/</link>
	<description>Slowing The Evolution Of The Liberal Mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G</title>
		<link>http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/04/video-sarah-palin-rnc-vp-acceptance-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monkeycrash.com/?p=182#comment-346</guid>
		<description>I gave Sarah Louise Palin (same first and middle name as our middle daughter) a 90% on her Acceptance Speech at the RNC last night.

I had to take off 5 percentage points each because (unless I somehow missed it) for her not mentioning that she was pro-life and WHY she was, and that she defined &quot;marriage&quot; as a union between one man and one woman.

We know that she IS pro-life and pro-tradional marriage, but it would&#039;ve been good to hear that from her last night.

Otherwise, we&#039;re talking about a near-perfect speech.

Some pundits today are mentioning how neither party has said much about the borders, but I don&#039;t see just WHAT &lt;i&gt;anyone&lt;/i&gt; can do short of putting a DOME over our entire continental US.

...just my thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave Sarah Louise Palin (same first and middle name as our middle daughter) a 90% on her Acceptance Speech at the RNC last night.</p>
<p>I had to take off 5 percentage points each because (unless I somehow missed it) for her not mentioning that she was pro-life and WHY she was, and that she defined &#8220;marriage&#8221; as a union between one man and one woman.</p>
<p>We know that she IS pro-life and pro-tradional marriage, but it would&#8217;ve been good to hear that from her last night.</p>
<p>Otherwise, we&#8217;re talking about a near-perfect speech.</p>
<p>Some pundits today are mentioning how neither party has said much about the borders, but I don&#8217;t see just WHAT <i>anyone</i> can do short of putting a DOME over our entire continental US.</p>
<p>&#8230;just my thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

