<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Kissinger Debate. Who Was Right; McCain Or Obama?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/27/the-kissinger-debate-who-was-right-mccain-or-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/27/the-kissinger-debate-who-was-right-mccain-or-obama/</link>
	<description>Slowing The Evolution Of The Liberal Mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jprkzoo</title>
		<link>http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/27/the-kissinger-debate-who-was-right-mccain-or-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>jprkzoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monkeycrash.com/?p=344#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Obama did NOT qualify his remark.  It was meant to be a jab at McCain, and McCain clarified it in relation to &quot;top level&quot; officials, such as the President.  Obama is not going to admit McCain is correct in his qualification.  It only works for Obama because the general public is not aware of Kissengers comments or stance regarding Iran, and Obama knows this.  Good politicians are great at being obscure, so they can call themselves &quot;correct.&quot;  Obama has arrived, as a good, classic politician, and is not naive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama did NOT qualify his remark.  It was meant to be a jab at McCain, and McCain clarified it in relation to &#8220;top level&#8221; officials, such as the President.  Obama is not going to admit McCain is correct in his qualification.  It only works for Obama because the general public is not aware of Kissengers comments or stance regarding Iran, and Obama knows this.  Good politicians are great at being obscure, so they can call themselves &#8220;correct.&#8221;  Obama has arrived, as a good, classic politician, and is not naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Esopo</title>
		<link>http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/27/the-kissinger-debate-who-was-right-mccain-or-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Esopo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monkeycrash.com/?p=344#comment-807</guid>
		<description>I forgot to add that Obama has stated many times in the past that he,himself,as President of the United States, would sit down unconditionally with any head of state.So its a mote point as to the exact wording in last nights debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to add that Obama has stated many times in the past that he,himself,as President of the United States, would sit down unconditionally with any head of state.So its a mote point as to the exact wording in last nights debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Esopo</title>
		<link>http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/27/the-kissinger-debate-who-was-right-mccain-or-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Esopo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monkeycrash.com/?p=344#comment-806</guid>
		<description>Senator Obama kept insisting during last nights debate that Henry Kissinger said that the President of the United States should meet with the leader of Iran.Senator Mccain insisted Kissinger would never say that.Who was telling the truth? After the Debate Kissinger released the following statement:

“Senator McCain is right. I would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level. My views on this issue are entirely compatible with the views of my friend Senator John McCain. We do not agree on everything, but we do agree that any negotiations with Iran must be geared to reality. “</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Obama kept insisting during last nights debate that Henry Kissinger said that the President of the United States should meet with the leader of Iran.Senator Mccain insisted Kissinger would never say that.Who was telling the truth? After the Debate Kissinger released the following statement:</p>
<p>“Senator McCain is right. I would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level. My views on this issue are entirely compatible with the views of my friend Senator John McCain. We do not agree on everything, but we do agree that any negotiations with Iran must be geared to reality. “</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckL</title>
		<link>http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/27/the-kissinger-debate-who-was-right-mccain-or-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monkeycrash.com/?p=344#comment-803</guid>
		<description>What is WRONG with you, Bryan??  Read the words spoken by BOTH men in the debate.   Obama NEVER SAID anything about a face-to-face meeting between leaders, ...he said &quot;we&quot;, clearly meaning GOVERNMENT officials, and not the President himself. Everything McCain said after that, and everything that Kissinger eventually said, are totally meaningless, since those comments are addressing McCain misrepresentation of Obama&#039;s words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is WRONG with you, Bryan??  Read the words spoken by BOTH men in the debate.   Obama NEVER SAID anything about a face-to-face meeting between leaders, &#8230;he said &#8220;we&#8221;, clearly meaning GOVERNMENT officials, and not the President himself. Everything McCain said after that, and everything that Kissinger eventually said, are totally meaningless, since those comments are addressing McCain misrepresentation of Obama&#8217;s words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Hannes</title>
		<link>http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/27/the-kissinger-debate-who-was-right-mccain-or-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>K Hannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monkeycrash.com/?p=344#comment-797</guid>
		<description>Something I notice about McPain is that he does NOT listen to what people say and then comments on what he THINKS he heard.  This is a big mistake if he is EVER expected to negotiate with anyone for anything.  Obama&#039;s intellect and poise shines through every time the man speaks.  He listens.  And it is obvious to anyone with a brain in their head to see this important difference between the two men.  McPain&#039;s solution is to  jump to action, pepper most of his responses with emotions and history, reassuring himself along the way, via what he says. He does listen to himself.  He is very repetitive and totally predictable.  This man is damaged goods and is probably too old to lead.  it is very sad to me that he did this publicly to himself, running for an office he could never handle.  His thought processes are flawed for running a country.  Or for running anything, for that matter.  If he expects to be elected, his competencies must outweigh his deviances.  He should have prepared for that better somehow.  Sarah Pain is not the answer, either.  No way, no how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I notice about McPain is that he does NOT listen to what people say and then comments on what he THINKS he heard.  This is a big mistake if he is EVER expected to negotiate with anyone for anything.  Obama&#8217;s intellect and poise shines through every time the man speaks.  He listens.  And it is obvious to anyone with a brain in their head to see this important difference between the two men.  McPain&#8217;s solution is to  jump to action, pepper most of his responses with emotions and history, reassuring himself along the way, via what he says. He does listen to himself.  He is very repetitive and totally predictable.  This man is damaged goods and is probably too old to lead.  it is very sad to me that he did this publicly to himself, running for an office he could never handle.  His thought processes are flawed for running a country.  Or for running anything, for that matter.  If he expects to be elected, his competencies must outweigh his deviances.  He should have prepared for that better somehow.  Sarah Pain is not the answer, either.  No way, no how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
